Medaffcon Makes Medtech Measurable When Data Determines Market Access
Medaffcon brings to the health technology market the kind of effectiveness and cost-conscious thinking well established in the pharmaceutical industry.
The United States is seeking to curb pharmaceutical expenditure by incorporating international price referencing into public health insurance programs, including Medicaid and Medicare. This policy direction was formalized on 12 May 2025 through the executive order Delivering Most Favored Nation Prescription Drug Pricing to American Patients. At Medaffcon, developments related to the MFN framework are being followed by Jarmo Hahl.
The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump has introduced the Most Favored Nation (MFN) principle into pharmaceutical pricing policy. The underlying objective is to address the persistent price gap whereby U.S. patients pay substantially higher prices for medicines compared with patients in Europe and other OECD countries.
Within the pharmaceutical context, MFN implies that the price of a medicine in one country may serve as a benchmark for pricing in other markets. In theory, a low price in a reference country can influence price levels globally. In practice, however, the situation is considerably more complex.
At present, the scope of MFN policy and its associated instruments remain limited. The coverage of products, payer segments and pricing mechanisms is narrow, and the policy framework continues to evolve. Moreover, the legal foundations of MFN pricing in the United States remain uncertain, creating additional complexity for stakeholders.
According to Jarmo Hahl, it is currently not possible to reliably predict the real-world impacts of MFN policy. The interdependencies between pricing, access, investment incentives and regulatory responses are still poorly understood. At the same time, key elements of the policy remain subject to legal and political scrutiny.
Following the 12 May 2025 executive order, several large pharmaceutical companies entered into agreements including substantial discounts offered through the TrumpRx portal, alongside MFN-based pricing commitments for medicines supplied to Medicaid under the GENEROUS program.
Looking ahead, MFN policy is expected to be further reinforced through the introduction of the GLOBE and GUARD initiatives, which are designed to strengthen the implementation of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). A central feature of both initiatives is international price referencing to selected OECD countries, linking U.S. net prices more closely to international benchmarks.
Although the full effects of MFN policy are not yet clear, certain implications can be anticipated. When the world’s largest pharmaceutical market seeks to anchor its prices to the lowest international levels, overall industry revenues are likely to come under pressure.
This development may have a disproportionate impact on investment in research and development, particularly in high-risk and innovative therapies. Reduced expected returns may lead companies to reassess R&D portfolios and focus investment on projects with lower risk profiles or clearer commercial potential.
In addition, companies may increasingly concentrate investments and operational activities in larger, higher-revenue markets, potentially reducing their presence in smaller countries.
MFN policy is likely to exert upward pressure on drug prices in Europe. From an industry perspective, maintaining sufficiently high European price levels may become necessary to prevent U.S. prices from being pulled down further through MFN comparisons.
At the same time, there is a risk that pharmaceutical investment in Europe may become more selective, focusing on large EU markets while smaller, traditionally lower-price countries receive less attention. This could weaken medicine availability in countries such as the Nordics and contribute to increased healthcare expenditure.
Over the longer term, MFN-driven pricing dynamics may slow the development of new medicines, delay product launches in smaller markets and reduce the overall pace of pharmaceutical innovation.
MFN functions as a powerful global steering mechanism that influences R&D investment decisions, international pricing dynamics and patient access to new therapies. U.S. drug prices are higher in part because pricing is not negotiated centrally, as is common in Europe. In this context, MFN-based models may function poorly, risk distorting global markets and create challenges related to medicine availability.
Medaffcon brings to the health technology market the kind of effectiveness and cost-conscious thinking well established in the pharmaceutical industry.
Medaffcon's scrum model provides an agile way of working, enabling seamless knowledge sharing between teams and keeping projects on track.
TTE is particularly valuable when there's a need to directly compare two treatments using real‑world data, especially when such comparisons have not been evaluated in RCTs.
Principal Consultant
MSc (Economics)
+358 40 139 4001
jarmo.hahl@medaffcon.com
Jarmo joined Medaffcon as a partner and CEO in 2010, having previously worked in various expert and management positions in pharma companies for eight years. Jarmo has a degree in economics and before entering the pharmaceutical industry, he held an office at the Turku School of Economics and also worked as a research fellow at Turku University Hospital.
Jarmo has strong expertise in new health technology innovations and how the demands and expectations of authorities, markets and customers are matched. He also brings to Medaffcon extensive experience in health economics and its applications in research and commercialization, as well as a broad understanding of the ever-changing operating environment.
“From an access point of view, the Finnish health technology market is constantly becoming more demanding and therefore also more attractive from my point of view. On the other hand, increasing demands to demonstrate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of healthcare are broadening the scope and opportunities for Medaffcon to be involved in the development of healthcare as a whole”.